OneGov
App. Status: DeniedAitkin County Planning & Zoning / Environmental Services
307 Second St. NW Room 219
Aitkin, MN 56431
Phone: 218-927-7342
Fax: 218-927-4372
Email: aitkinpz@aitkincountymn.gov
Contact Information
| Enter Applicant Contact Information: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Are you the Property Owner? | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Location
| Property Location: |
|
| Does your property have an E911 address assigned? | Yes |
| Enter directions to the property (if no property address assigned): | Hwy 47 South to Cty Rd 102 (Rabbit Lake Rd), take a right on the dirt road and drive exactly one mile...the garage is located on the left-hand side of the road. |
[
]
[ Search Result Limit: Project Checklist
| 1.) Is the property zoned Shoreland? | No |
| 3.) Are there any wetlands or lowlands on/near the project site? | Yes |
| 4.) Will the structure(s) be used for commercial purposes? | No |
| 5.) Is there an existing septic system on the property? (Outhouse/Privies are also considered septic systems) |
Yes |
Existing Septic Status
| Do you have a Certificate of Compliance, Certificate of Installation, Design for a new system, or does your project fall under Exemption A or B above? | Yes |
Project Description
| Please describe your proposed project: | Proposing to expand the existing 12'x20' garage (using the existing cement slab) and building it into a 24'x36' garage. |
Project Type
| Item 1 - Structure Type: | Accessory Building |
| Item 1 - Size: | 864 ft2 |
Site Plan
| Attach Site Plan: |
|
Garage_May2016.pdfAdditional Info
| Additional info: (optional) |
Charlie Christensen from the Glen Township came out to the site and reviewed the proposed expansion / location of the garage. The proposed garage site meets the requirement for being greater than 43 feet from the center of the Glen Township Road. |
Terms
Defining and staking the property lines, road right-of-ways, septic sites, and wells are the responsibility of the property owner. In some cases, a registered survey may be required to verify setbacks before granting a permit.
It shall be a violation of the Aitkin County Zoning Ordinance to commence construction before the permit application is approved by Aitkin County.
The septic installer shall notify Aitkin County Environmental Services a minimum of twenty-four (24) hours before the covering of any portion of the septic installation. Changes from the approved septic design will require approval by the County prior to construction.
Zoning permits and Subsurface Sewage Treatment System permits are valid for one (1) year (unless the sewage permit is to upgrade an Imminent Threat to Public Health or Safety system, which is then valid for ten (10) months).
All corners of the proposed structure(s) need to be staked with visible flags, ribbon, or lathes prior to onsite inspection by Aitkin County.
If property lines are not clearly marked and visible, then they need to be staked with visible flags, ribbon, or lathes prior to onsite inspection by Aitkin County.
After a complete application is submitted and reviewed, an on-site inspection may be conducted; a permit may be issued describing the proposed construction that may take place on the property. Changes to a project may require a permit application to be resubmitted.
The landowner or authorized agent may make application for a zoning permit agreeing to do such work in accordance with all Aitkin County Ordinances. The landowner or authorized agent agrees that the application, site plan, and all other attachments submitted herewith are true and accurate and shall become a part of the permit. The landowner or authorized agent agrees that, in making application for a zoning permit, the landowner grants permission to Aitkin County, at reasonable times, to enter the property to determine compliance of the application with applicable Local, County or State Ordinances or Statutes. It is the applicants sole responsibility to contact other Local, County or State agencies to ensure the applicant has complied with all relevant Local, County or State Ordinances or Statutes.
Applicants acknowledge that they are in compliance with MN Statute 326.121 subd 1 which states "The State Building Code is the standard that applies statewide for the construction, reconstruction, alteration, repair, use of buildings and other structures of the type governed by the code."
Applicants acknowledge that they are in compliance with MN Contractor Licensing laws per MN Statute 326B.85.
Applicants are responsible for getting all applicable entrance permits from the appropriate road authority.
Invoice #534 (05/16/2016)
| Charge | Cost | Quantity | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| added 05/16/2016 4:43 PM $175 Flat Fee |
$175.00 | x 1 | $175.00 |
| Grand Total | |||
| Total | $175.00 | ||
| Payment 05/24/2016 | $175.00 | ||
| Due | $0.00 | ||
Approvals
| Approval | Signature | Options |
|---|---|---|
| Applicant | Julie A. McChesney - 05/24/2016 3:52 PM 384d634376bf59f3c5b5930602bfeb13 190f2ab32344f53fa05a4f18e04e594a | |
| #1 Administrative Review | ||
| #2 Inspector Review | ||
| #3 Final Approval |
| Text: | 7/6/2016 partial refund of $75 given via ACH. KK ($100 site inspection fee is non-refundable) 6/8/16 permit application denied due to the 30 foot road right-of-way setback not being met. Correspondence attached. |
| File(s): |
|
| Text: | 6/8/16 Permit denied. $75.00 refunded on 6/14/2016 - the remaining $100 can be used toward a standard permit if applied for within 1 year. 6.2.16 I called and left a message for Charlie Christensen to call me back - We need something in writing that shows the r-o-w has changed and if so, what is it now. Once we get that information, we need to figure out if the proposed building will meet the 30 foot setback to the r-o-w. KK 6.2.16 accidentally moved status to incomplete with an incorrect note in it meant for another applicant. Called and left message with Julie and sent an email as well. KS 5.31.16 sent Roberta an email - previous variance - row changed? KK 5.31.16 I called Julie - there is a previous variance on file for this structure to be too close to the r-o-w, therefore it will require a variance. Julie stated Charlie Christensen (Glen Township supervisor) was out on site and stated the r-o-w has changed and the structure and proposed addition will meet the setback requirement. I told her that I would need to verify that with the Township. KK 5/25/16 sent Julie and email...need compliance inspection. Will send app back if she does not have a CI. KS |
| File(s): |
|
| Date application was complete: | |
| Review started by: | Kristi Kunz |
| Zoning District of project location: | |
| Required OWHL setback distance: | |
| "Other" OHWL setback distance is: | |
| Project located in the floodplain? | |
| Base Flood Elevation: | |
| Lowest Floor Elevation: | |
| Is an after construction elevation certificate required? | |
| Property line setbacks appear to be met? | |
| Road R-O-W setbacks appear to be met? | |
| Bluff setbacks appear to be met? | |
| Septic Tank setback appears to be met with/without an engineer's report? | |
| Septic Drainfield setback appears to be met with/without an engineer's report? | |
| Is the parcel a Lot of Record before 1-21-92 or have alternate sites been identified? | |
| Is this New Construction on a previously undeveloped lot or Redevelopment added to a developed lot? | |
| Is this After-The-Fact? |
| Zoning Inspector: | |
| SSTS Type: | |
| SSTS Design: | |
| New or Replacement SSTS: | |
| GPD: | |
| # of bedrooms: | |
| Does this system require an Operating Permit? | |
| Operating Permit #: | |
| Does this system belong to an other establishment? | |
| Is this a Cluster System? | |
| Attachments: |
| Zoning Inspector: | |
| Attach necessary inspection forms/photos: | |
| Notes: | |
| Was an onsite conducted for this application? |
| Self Install? | |
| Installer Name: |
None
|
| New Tanks: | |
| Existing Tanks: | |
| Date of Final Inspection: | |
| Attach Final Certificate of Installation: | |
| Low Interest Loan or SSTS Grant project? |